Canadian data and analysis

Countability

Data Intelligence

Clear answers from complex evidence.

Countability turns evidence into reproducible, decision-relevant intelligence. Its current public work makes the method inspectable; under a scoped engagement, the same discipline can be applied to an organization's own evidence.

Countability is built on a deterministic engine that produces the same output from the same inputs; no exaggerations and no hallucinations.

Now Assessed 2026-09-08

All readings ↗

Open a subject for the complete assessment and its qualifications.

See what changed, what stayed the same, and what comes next →

New domains · September 9, 2026

Two more ways to understand Canada.

Defence & Security

What does defence spending buy?

DND programme spending$33.9BFiscal 2024–25 · nominal Canadian dollars

Follow the resources, the people, and the reported readiness of the forces. Spending and operational capability require separate tests.

Health

Are Canadians getting the care they need?

Have a regular care provider82.6%2024 · adults 18+ · provinces

Explore access to care across provinces and ages, life expectancy, and substance harms. Having a provider does not establish timely access.

Infrastructure and business · September 9, 2026

What gets built. What keeps businesses moving.

Infrastructure Delivery

From approved funding to reported delivery

Project entries in the captured file20,423Includes studies and plans; latest reported end 2025-03-27

Explore reported progress, retained forecasts, public investment and the age of the capital base. The dates and populations remain visible.

Business Dynamism & Credit

The movement behind the employer count

Active employer businesses936,9592026-05 · Canada · seasonally adjusted

Follow openings, returning employers, closures and delayed exits, alongside corporate credit and formal financial distress.

Current intelligence

Thirteen diagonal black-and-white photographs representing every province and territory, from Canada Place and the Rockies to Atlantic coastlines and the northern mountains.
Ten provinces · Three territories Photographers, places & licences ↗

Explore the public record

A closer look
at Canada.

Big Question · Geopolitics & trade

Can Canada sell beyond the United States?

Roughly three of every four Canadian export dollars have gone to one customer for a generation. Selling more to everyone else has been a stated national ambition for fifty years, and since the broad United States tariff actions became legally effective it has been the declared strategy. Whether it is actually happening is checkable, month by month, in the official trade record — and the answer decides which industries carry policy risk, what diversification plans are worth, and how much of the economy moves when the United States does.

GenerationalBlocked1 evidence gap
Read the record →

What Measured, Contested and Blocked mean →

Reading updates Assessed 2026-09-08

All readings ↗

The latest readings, with the earlier record preserved below.

Earlier readings (25)
  • Unchanged
    Evidence: 2026-08-28Capital stock per worker — August record checkRead the assessmentClose assessment

    The capital question was re-checked against the release it was waiting for, and not one of its figures moved. Capital stock per worker is still down 3.7 per cent since 2019 and 5.7 per cent from the record's 2014 peak; real business investment per worker is still down 7.2 per cent; the investment share of GDP still barely moved, from 20.6 per cent in 2014 to 18.6 per cent in 2025. The new quarter is real and is recorded: business gross fixed capital formation ran at $427,991 million in chained 2017 dollars, seasonally adjusted at annual rates, and $618,156 million at current prices, in April-June 2026.

    More: Is Canada rebuilding the capital behind each worker?
  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-08-22U.S. tariff escalationRead the assessmentClose assessment

    In July, the United States moved to put a 50 per cent tariff on lists of Canadian goods -- three separate proclamations, each with an effective date of August 19. The U.S. then delayed that effective date by three days, to August 22 -- the proclamation that did this says senior U.S. officials reported that Canada had promised to change the practices at issue, not a finding the proclamation makes in its own voice. But no deal was reached. On August 21, the Prime Minister said last-minute changes in the U.S. position were unfair, and put the reliability of any deal in doubt. He suspended trade talks and called Canada's negotiators home. The duties became legally effective the next day, August 22, under the proclamations, on roughly $28 billion of Canadian goods. This record has not yet observed duties assessed or collected on shipments. The government's own figure doesn't say which country's dollars. Canada said it would match the tariffs dollar for dollar. The day after that, the Prime Minister said Canada's own measures would begin 'the Tuesday after Labour Day.' This record does not turn that into a calendar date, and at the time, no rate or full list of goods had been given. The most recent trade figures on this record are from June, before any of this happened.

    More: The Tariff Ledger
  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-06-15Opioid harms — first readingRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Countability's first dated reading on Canada's opioid-toxicity death record. The Public Health Agency of Canada's released file reports 5,630 apparent opioid toxicity deaths in Canada in 2025. That is 1,696 fewer than the 7,326 it reports for 2024 -- a fall of 23.2 per cent as currently reported. But 5,630 is not a settled count. The agency's own technical notes say that data resting on open investigations “are considered preliminary and subject to change”, and that an investigation “can range from approximately three to twenty-four months”. Measured back from the file's own cut-off of 12 May 2026, that window still reaches across every month of 2025. The file itself says none of this. None of its eleven columns flags an observation as preliminary. No cell in its 30,316 rows carries the words “preliminary”, “provisional” or “subject to change”. So a reader holding only the machine-readable file cannot tell which of its numbers are still moving.

  • New reading
    Evidence: 2025-12-31Conserved areas — first readingRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Countability's first dated reading on Canada's conservation commitment -- and it is a subtraction. Canada's stated target, in Environment and Climate Change Canada's own words on its conserved-areas indicator page, is “to conserve 25% of its lands and 25% of its oceans by 2025, and 30% of each by 2030”. The same department's own measurement of the same thing, in its Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database summary table dated December 2025, is 14.0 per cent of Canada's land territory conserved, and 15.5 per cent of its marine territory. Against the 2030 target, that is a gap of 16.0 percentage points on land -- 1,594,621 square kilometres -- and 14.5 points at sea, or 831,037 square kilometres. The 25 per cent milestone's own stated date has now passed; measured against that milestone at the same reference date, the gaps are 11.0 points on land and 9.5 at sea. Nothing here says whether either target will be met. Both percentages are the publisher's own, and so is the 2030 gap -- its own indicator page states that distance. What this record adds is the same subtraction against the milestone whose date has passed, plus the square-kilometre size behind each of the 2030 gaps.

  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-08-10Federal debt since ConfederationRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Countability's first dated reading over a century and a half of federal debt. Finances of the Nation publishes one file covering federal government debt from Confederation onward. The copy this record holds carries 156 consecutive annual observations of net federal debt as a share of GDP -- one for every year from 1867 to fiscal year 2021/2022, none missing. The last observation is 43.71 per cent of GDP, at fiscal year 2021/2022: that year ended 31 March 2022, not the present. The highest reading anywhere in the run is 110.31 per cent, at fiscal year 1945/46. The lowest is 11.60 per cent, at 1912/13. This is a reference spine, not something this record follows on a schedule: as of a 10 August 2026 read of the metadata the file's host repository keeps for it, it was last modified on 6 January 2023, and its series ends four fiscal years before this reading was written.

  • Revision
    Evidence: 2026-08-11Ontario municipal filings — 2024 revisionsRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Ontario's 2024 municipal Financial Information Return changed between two copies Countability kept -- and it changed in three ways at once. Of the 402 municipalities present in the copy kept on 25 July 2026, exactly two have figures that moved by the copy kept on 11 August. Port Hope's return moves a 175,000-dollar amount between two development-charges reserve-fund lines: in two columns, the amount moves off the line the province labels “Other” and onto the line it labels “Highways (Roads and Structures)”, while in a third column the same amount moves the other way. South Bruce's return moves along its asset-retirement-obligation chain: accretion expense and total asset retirement obligations each rise by 4,181 dollars, from 37,380 to 41,561. The third change is not a restatement at all: three municipalities -- Douro-Dummer, Highlands East and Atikokan -- appear in the file for the first time, with no rows at all in the earlier copy. That takes the file from 402 filers to 405.

  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-17July 2026 consumer pricesRead the assessmentClose assessment

    July’s Consumer Price Index is now in the record, and it rearranges the price story this record has been telling. Prices overall rose 3.0 per cent over the year to July, up from 2.8 per cent in June. The index itself rose 0.5 per cent on the month. Rent inflation fell to 2.5 per cent — its lowest reading since November 2021. For the first time since January 2023, rent rose more slowly over the year than prices overall: the gap between rent and the headline rate was +0.7 of a percentage point in June, and is now −0.5. Energy moved fastest over the year: gasoline stood 25.7 per cent above a year earlier, and energy as a whole was up 16.6 per cent. May’s readings were higher still, at 33.2 and 22.2, so July is a re-acceleration inside a volatile year, not a peak. These are the fastest-moving of the twenty-two price series this record holds from the headline table, not measured shares of the headline number; this record holds no basket weights. The Bank of Canada’s preferred core measures sit below the headline: 1.9 per cent (CPI-trim), 2.0 per cent (CPI-median), and 2.7 per cent (CPI-common). Measured pay rose 2.8 per cent over the same year, 0.2 of a point behind prices.

    More: Can governments still solve housing shortages?
  • Revision
    Evidence: 2026-08-11Ontario municipal filings — 2023 revisionRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Ontario republished the 2023 municipal Financial Information Return -- a filing year that closed three years ago -- and one filer's numbers changed. Stratford's return now differs from the version published in July: 581 reported lines carry different values, and a further 78 lines were added and 77 removed. Its equity in tangible capital assets is 47.1 million dollars higher than the figure previously published. Its Ontario conditional grants are 11.5 million dollars lower than the figure previously published. A prior period adjustment of 5.8 million dollars now appears where none was reported before. The filer's own last-updated stamp moved from 22 October 2025 to 4 August 2026. Of the 436 filers present in the file, Stratford is the only one whose figures moved at all.

  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-07July 2026 unemploymentRead the assessmentClose assessment

    The unemployment rate was 6.4 per cent in July 2026 -- its lowest reading since July 2024. It has now fallen for three months running: from 6.9 per cent in April, to 6.6, to 6.5, to 6.4. For people aged 25 to 54 it was 5.5 per cent. The share of everyone aged 15 and over in work was 60.9 per cent.

  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-07July 2026 youth employmentRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Youth unemployment was 12.6 per cent in July 2026 -- the lowest reading since February 2024, when it was 12.1 per cent. The share of people aged 15 to 24 in work was 55.4 per cent. No month since May 2024 has been that high; May 2024 was 55.4 per cent exactly, so July 2026 matches it rather than beating it. A year earlier, those two figures were 14.5 and 53.7 per cent.

  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-07Full-time and part-time employment — JulyRead the assessmentClose assessment

    All of the past year's net employment growth, and more, was full-time. Over the twelve months to July 2026 full-time employment rose by 205,700 while part-time employment fell by 9,200, for a net gain of 196,500. Part-time work went from 18.38 to 18.16 per cent of all employment.

    More: Can Canada absorb its own population growth?
  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-07July absorption ratio — the population baseRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Employment growth is not what pushed the absorption ratio close to one. Over the twelve months to July 2026 the ratio reached 0.996. It got there because the number it divides by got much smaller: the year's gain in the Labour Force Survey's working-age population estimate fell from 715,000 to 197,300 — 72.4 per cent smaller. Employment grew 196,500 over that year. Over the twelve months to July 2025 it grew 293,200. So the ratio moved from 0.41 to almost 1.00 while the annual employment gain itself got smaller.

    More: Can Canada absorb its own population growth?
  • Unchanged
    Evidence: 2026-08-07July labour release — revision checkRead the assessmentClose assessment

    The July release added a month and restated nothing this record can see. This record compared its copy of the labour table from before the release with its copy from after. All 3,491 monthly values the two copies share are identical. Each of the ten series gained exactly one new month, and of the earlier months held on both sides, not one moved.

  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-10July labour absorptionRead the assessmentClose assessment

    One more month of labour data changes the absorption answer. Over the twelve months to July 2026, employment rose by 196,500 while the Labour Force Survey's working-age population estimate rose by 197,300. That is 1.00 jobs added for each additional working-age person, as published -- 0.996 before rounding. On the June window this record read 0.45. Employment growth has gone from covering under half of working-age population growth to coming within half a per cent of matching it.

    More: Can Canada absorb its own population growth?
  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-10May 2026 temporary-resident flowsRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada's monthly records now run to May 2026. Three of the four monthly flows this record follows are falling less steeply than a month earlier, and the fourth is rising faster. Study permits are down 12.4 per cent on the previous twelve months, against 16.6 per cent in the April window. Work permits went from 3.3 per cent up to 9.8 per cent up. Permanent-resident admissions are down 15.6 per cent, against 17.1 per cent. Asylum claims are down 34.9 per cent, against 35.2 per cent.

    More: Can Canada absorb its own population growth?
  • Revision
    Evidence: 2026-08-10Revisions to immigration recordsRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Alongside the new month, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada restated 153 previously published values across its five monthly series, some reaching back to 2015. Those restatements barely moved the headline year-over-year figures: 0.11 points on study permits, 0.16 points on work permits, and 0.10 points on asylum claims -- each pulling the opposite way from the improvement reported above -- and 0.01 points on permanent-resident admissions, pulling the same way.

    More: Can Canada absorb its own population growth?
  • Unchanged
    Evidence: 2026-08-10Housing supply — record checkRead the assessmentClose assessment

    The housing supply readings are unchanged -- and that is a finding, not something skipped. This record refreshed all 148 of its source files for this update. Housing starts, units under construction, and the quarterly and annual completions series came back with every value identical to what this record already held.

    More: Can governments still solve housing shortages?
  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-08-10Labour indicator cluster — membership updateRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Nine labour indicators shifted level together, inside one six-month window from December 2023 to June 2024. That published finding still stands, and the count is still nine -- but which nine has changed. With the new July data, total employment's own level shift now dates from August 2024, outside that window, so it drops out of the group. That indicator's shift is not published as its own separate reading, so where it was visible through the group, it is now not reported at all. Because total employment left the group, the measure of employment added per working-age person added now counts in its own right. It had been set aside before, because the series it is an arithmetic transform of was then in the group.

  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-08-04June 2026 trade readingRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Second reading, on the June 2026 trade record. Over the twelve months through June 2026, the United States bought 69.07 per cent of Canada's goods exports, against 74.48 per cent a year earlier. That is a one-year fall of 5.41 percentage points -- shallower than the 5.78-point fall the May window showed, and well short of the record's fastest fall, 7.16 points, in the window ending March 2026. The share sits just above its record low: the March and April 2026 windows jointly hold that low, at 69.01 per cent, only 0.004 points apart. U.S.-bound exports have now risen for five straight months.

    More: Can Canada sell beyond the United States?
  • New period
    Evidence: 2026-07-20June 2026 consumer pricesRead the assessmentClose assessment

    June's Consumer Price Index is now in the record. Prices overall rose 2.8 per cent over the year to June -- down from 3.2 per cent in May. The index itself fell 0.4 per cent on the month. Rent inflation was 3.5 per cent, about where it stood in May, so the gap between rent inflation and overall inflation widened again: from 0.3 of a percentage point in May to 0.7 in June.

    More: Can governments still solve housing shortages?
  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-07-20Federal fiscal outlook — first readingRead the assessmentClose assessment

    First reading of a new question. The government's own projected deficit for fiscal 2025-26 has moved several times: $38.9 billion, then $42.2 billion, then $78.3 billion, before narrowing to $66.9 billion -- its last projection before the Public Accounts settle the year. The government's own unaudited year-end tally shows $55.3 billion, which comes before the post-March tax accruals, valuation changes, and other adjustments recorded before those accounts settle a year. On Statistics Canada's separate National Accounts basis, the same year measures $44.8 billion, or 1.4 per cent of GDP. Federal interest now takes 10.0 per cent of federal revenue, up from 5.9 per cent four fiscal years earlier. No audited outcome exists yet: the Public Accounts of Canada settle this fiscal year this autumn.

    More: Does the federal budget land where it was promised?
  • Unchanged
    Evidence: 2026-07-19Capacity Monitor — housing updateRead the assessmentClose assessment

    The Canadian Capacity Monitor was checked again against a complete housing-starts update. Housing delivery still lags both independent benchmarks, and the gap against each widened slightly in the newest quarter. Every other row was rechecked against the same update, and no other row's answer moved: population pressure, the labour market, and federal fiscal room.

    More: Can governments still solve housing shortages?
  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-07-08NATO spending benchmarksRead the assessmentClose assessment

    The government says it hit NATO's 2% guideline, and NATO's own report says every member country reported spending that met or exceeded it. But that is not NATO's only guideline. NATO's own newer, larger one is 5% of GDP a year by 2035, split into 3.5% on core defence requirements and 1.5% on broader defence- and security-related investment. Canada's own core spending sits near 2% -- well short of the 3.5% core share that pathway requires.

  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-07-18Capital stock per worker — first readingRead the assessmentClose assessment

    First reading of a new question. Non-residential capital stock per worker has fallen since the record's 2014 peak: down 3.7 per cent since 2019, and 5.7 per cent since that peak. This stock measure covers the whole economy -- government and non-profit capital as well as business capital. Real business investment per worker fell 7.2 per cent from 2019 to 2025. But the investment share of GDP barely moved over the same span. The per-worker declines are substantially a story about a growing workforce, not a spending collapse.

    More: Is Canada rebuilding the capital behind each worker?
  • New reading
    Evidence: 2026-07-17Electricity supply scenariosRead the assessmentClose assessment

    Countability's first dated reading on Canada's electricity buildout. The Canada Energy Regulator's own Energy Future 2026 dataset carries four scenarios for Canada's electricity supply out to 2035 and 2050. Every one of them -- including the most conservative -- assumes a pace several times the dataset's own recorded 2005-2023 average, and faster than any twelve-year stretch inside that record. For generation, the scenarios assume roughly seven to fourteen times the full-period average pace, and roughly 1.7 to 3.1 times the fastest twelve-year stretch. For installed capacity, they assume roughly two to four times the average pace, and roughly 1.6 to 2.6 times the fastest twelve-year stretch. The measured record since the projections' history ends is split: capacity shows a strong recent build year, while generation increased through 2025 but its freshest trailing-twelve-month window has not sustained that increase.

    More: Is Canada on track for its climate commitments — and would the record show it?

See what changed, what stayed the same, and what comes next →

Selected Insights

Findings from the current record, each stating how strong its evidence is and naming its sources.

Explore the cited findings
INFERRED

NPR share 6.18% vs the sub-5% end-2027 target: on a straight-line pace

The government's 2026-2028 Levels Plan commits to a temporary population below 5% of Canada's population by end-2027. On 2026-04-01 the NPR share was 6.18% (StatsCan basis), vs 6.85% at the start of the plan period. A straight line from 6.85% (2025 Q4) to 5.0% (end 2027) passes through 6.44% today; the observed share is at or below that line. The straight-line path is Countability's measurement convention — IRCC stated only the endpoint. IRCC's 'temporary population' concept and StatsCan's NPR estimate differ at the margin; the StatsCan basis is used consistently.

Technical details
Method: Linear glidepath from the 2025-10-01 NPR share to 5.0% at 2028-01-01; on pace if latest share ≤ glidepath value. Target from IRCC Levels Plan 2026-2028.

Why it matters: The temporary-resident share is the government's own chosen lever for easing absorption pressure — this tracks whether the lever is actually moving. Next evidence: Statistics Canada quarterly demographic estimates.

INFERRED

Federal deficit widened to -1.48% of GDP over the four quarters ending 2026 Q2, against the declining-deficit-to-GDP anchor

Over the four quarters from 2025 Q3 through 2026 Q2, federal net lending or borrowing on the National Accounts basis was -1.48% of nominal GDP, versus -1.23% over 2024 Q3 through 2025 Q2 — a year-over-year deterioration. Each ratio divides the sum of four quarterly net-lending/borrowing observations by the sum of GDP for the same quarters; both inputs are seasonally adjusted at annual rates, so their common scaling cancels. The government's fiscal anchor (Budget 2025, reaffirmed in the Spring Economic Update 2026) names a declining deficit-to-GDP ratio over 2025-26 to 2030-31. This rolling-year test is Countability's stated pace convention, not a path the government promised each quarter. The National Accounts basis differs from Finance Canada's Public Accounts budgetary balance. Correction: this pace calculation now follows its registered four-quarter convention; the earlier implementation compared single quarters a year apart. The direction on the refreshed evidence is deterioration under either window, but the percentages differ.

Technical details
Method: Ratio = sum of four quarters' federal net lending/borrowing (SAAR) ÷ sum of the same quarters' nominal GDP (SAAR) × 100 (Statistics Canada tables 36-10-0477 and 36-10-0104); compare with the preceding four-quarter window. These are ratios of aligned sums, not means of quarterly ratios.

Why it matters: Every other federal commitment competes for the room this declining-deficit anchor is meant to protect. Next evidence: Quarterly government finance statistics.

INFERRED

Employment grew 1.16 employed people per person aged 15 and over added over the year to Aug 2026

In the 12 months to Aug 2026, employment (age 15+, seasonally adjusted) rose by 216,500 while the LFS working-age population estimate rose by 187,000 — 1.16 employed people added per additional working-age person, vs 0.30 a year earlier. A ratio at or above 1 suggests employment growth is keeping pace with (or exceeding) working-age population growth; below 1 suggests the labour market is absorbing the growing working-age population more slowly than it is growing. This says nothing about participation-rate changes, part-time/full-time mix, hours worked, or sector/regional composition. In the latest month alone, employment changed by -41,700 people. The annual comparison's base month changed by -61,700 people from its preceding month; moving the base therefore changes the annual employment gain by +20,000. A higher annual ratio does not by itself establish stronger current-month employment.

Technical details
Method: Ratio = Δemployment (age 15+, SA, 12 months) ÷ Δ LFS working-age population estimate (age 15+, SA, 12 months).

Why it matters: Employed people added per person aged fifteen and over added shows how annual employment growth compares with growth in that population. Next evidence: Monthly Labour Force Survey.

INFERRED

CMHC's 2025-06 housing benchmark uses a different measure from starts

Canada started 255,061 homes in the 4 quarters to 2026 Q2 (actual, all areas). CMHC's 2025-06 modelled benchmark — restore housing affordability to 2019 (pre-pandemic) levels by 2035, on a rolling 10-year horizon — implies ~478,000 net completions per year over 2025-2035. The comparison crosses unit bases: the benchmark is completions-denominated, but official all-areas WDS completions end in 2022 (latest annual figure: 219,942 in 2022). Direct CMHC metropolitan completion counts are now held, but they are gross monthly units on narrower geography, not this national net-additions basis. Current starts are shown as context, not compliance. The benchmark is a model with stated assumptions, not an observation; the rival benchmark differs by 3.8× on definitions alone (see the housing baseline conflict).

Technical details
Method: Trailing 4-quarter sum of actual housing starts ÷ CMHC benchmark annual rate × 100. Benchmark from cmhc-supply-gap-2025 (2025-06), taken as published; unit-basis mismatch stated.

Why it matters: Whether construction is actually closing the gap to the shortfall CMHC itself sized is the plainest test of whether housing delivery is keeping pace. Next evidence: Quarterly housing starts, under construction and completions (StatsCan 34-10-0135-01).

INFERRED

Quebec's budgetary balance widened to -1.11% of GDP in 2024, against its stated path back to balance

Quebec's budgetary balance (Provincial and Territorial Economic Accounts basis, calendar year) was -1.11% of nominal GDP in 2024, vs -1.02% the year before — a year-over-year deterioration. Return to budgetary balance, after deposits to the Generations Fund, no later than fiscal year 2029-2030, per the Balanced Budget Act (Loi sur l'équilibre budgétaire) (Government of Quebec (Ministère des Finances), Budget 2025-2026 (Plan budgétaire), "Un Québec fort"). Countability tests this year-over-year since the province named a multi-year path, not a single-year guarantee; the StatsCan basis differs from the province's own fiscal-year Public Accounts figures (named in a published evidence gap), used consistently here and named in every claim.

Technical details
Method: Ratio = provincial general government surplus/deficit ÷ provincial nominal GDP, same calendar year (StatsCan tables 36-10-0450 + 36-10-0222); year-over-year comparison vs the prior calendar year. Target from the province's own budget document.

Why it matters: A province's own balanced-budget commitment is the cleanest test of whether fiscal anchors bind in practice. Next evidence: Québec budget publications.

Investigations

Public proof and portable discipline

Live public proof — Canada's public record is Countability's current proving ground, with sources, methods and corrections open to inspection. The Living Standards Brief shows the method end to end. Illustrative application — an organization could use the same discipline to pin an approved plan and its assumptions, compare later evidence on the same basis, and keep a dated answer to whether the original decision reading still holds. This does not describe a performed engagement.

13 Big Questions published of 17 registered10 domains93 registered sources4 Signals published of 7 registeredthe projection-resolution record
Work with Countability

The method, in brief

The same inputs always produce the same record. Every claim names its dated public source; corrections are published and dated, never silent edits. Institutional projections stay on the record and are compared with the outcomes that follow — a record, never a ranking.