Big Question
HousingDecadalContestedBlockedConsistent with researchNot measurable

Can governments still solve housing shortages?

Housing supply matters for rent pressure and affordability. Current metropolitan completion counts now show more of the construction record, but the national shortfall models disagree and a comparable national net-additions measure is still missing.

What Measured, Contested and Blocked mean →

Two federal institutions disagree by a wide margin on how much housing the country needs. Current metropolitan completion counts show more of what is being built, but do not establish national net additions or progress against those models. Whether the shortage is narrowing is a question no single number currently answers.

Housing evidence · Assessed 2026-09-08

From permission to completion

18,797 homes completed in metropolitan areas in July 2026.

Current completions are now visible in CMHC’s metropolitan-area tables. This narrows our earlier data gap; it does not tell us whether Canada’s national housing shortage is closing.

Four separate observations, not the same homes moving through a funnel. Permits cover Canada; the other three measures below cover CMHC’s metropolitan-area tables. All are unadjusted dwelling counts.

01 · Authorized

25,382

May 2026

Canada · permits issued during the month. Permission to build does not establish a start.

Source and definition ↓

02 · Started

16,374

July 2026

Metropolitan areas · construction began during the month. This is a flow.

Source and definition ↓

03 · Under construction

362,059

End of July 2026

Metropolitan areas · unfinished units at month end. This is a stock, not a monthly flow.

Source and definition ↓

04 · Completed

18,797

July 2026

Metropolitan areas · gross completions during the month. Not net of demolitions or conversions.

Source and definition ↓

A completion is a construction milestone, not proof of occupancy; CMHC can count a unit with up to 10% of work unfinished. These observations do not measure cancellations or a permit-to-completion success rate.

What kind of homes were completed?

Selected metropolitan areas, July 2026. Each bar shows the mix within that area, not its share of Canada. Rental is the intended market; it does not establish affordability or who moved in.

HomeownershipRentalCondoCo-opUnclassified
Halifax116Homeownership: 53 · Rental: 63 · Condo: 0 · Co-op: 0 · Unclassified: 0
Montréal3,403Homeownership: 213 · Rental: 2,412 · Condo: 778 · Co-op: 0 · Unclassified: 0
Toronto1,009Homeownership: 533 · Rental: 28 · Condo: 448 · Co-op: 0 · Unclassified: 0
Calgary1,879Homeownership: 713 · Rental: 912 · Condo: 254 · Co-op: 0 · Unclassified: 0
Edmonton1,729Homeownership: 661 · Rental: 1,053 · Condo: 15 · Co-op: 0 · Unclassified: 0
Vancouver2,123Homeownership: 147 · Rental: 1,545 · Condo: 431 · Co-op: 0 · Unclassified: 0
Read the metropolitan totals and earlier edition
Unadjusted dwelling units; separate flow and stock measures
MonthStartsUnder construction
at month end
Completions
June 202618,299364,50817,588
July 202616,374362,05918,797

Each edition is retained separately. These unadjusted monthly observations do not establish a trend or a cancellation rate.

What the national benchmarks mean

The CMHC and Parliamentary Budget Officer paths are separate models of national net additions. The monthly, metropolitan gross counts above cannot be used to calculate progress against either one.

What remains missing—and what changed

Before this update, Countability’s three Statistics Canada completion series ended in 2022. They still do. Direct CMHC Excel files now provide a reproducible route to current metropolitan counts.

The broader provincial totals include smaller-centre observations despite notes saying completions are collected only in metropolitan areas plus Charlottetown. We use the explicitly labelled metropolitan tables and leave that wider coverage conflict unresolved. The 2023 geography change prevents a simple splice onto the older record.

National net additions, matching conversions and demolitions, cancellations, and linked permit-to-occupancy cohorts remain unavailable on a verified comparable basis in this reading.

Sources, dates and exact observations

Permits: Statistics Canada, table 34-10-0292-01; May 2026, Canada, new dwellings, unadjusted. Existing held series; not refreshed by this CMHC update.

Construction stages workbook, June 2026 · Published 2026-07-30. Archived copy SHA-256: c83f300be909ae7aa94a2e6c33486dc4e38a141e1f3a609d4ea403cbea9a4d0d

June 2026 metropolitan totals: starts: Table A4_1!F50; under construction: Table A5_1!F50; completions: Table A4_1!K50. Counts are read from those cells; category and geography sums are checked separately.

Construction stages workbook, July 2026 · Published 2026-08-25. Archived copy SHA-256: 79354815f627c24dd246d90c91f7cc7151f089f1964e39cb3704592a55779012

Intended market workbook, July 2026 · Published 2026-08-25. Archived copy SHA-256: e0d01da6380737d3b8ea981e7deaa344de45ebd8bea4e89a84f401b22d1061be

July 2026 metropolitan totals: starts: Table A4_1!F50; under construction: Table A5_1!F50; completions: Table A4_1!K50. Counts are read from those cells; category and geography sums are checked separately.

Halifax intended-market observations: Homeownership: Table F5-4!C17; Rental: Table F5-4!D17; Condo: Table F5-4!E17; Co-op: Table F5-4!F17; Not Available: Table F5-4!G17; Total: Table F5-4!H17.

Montréal intended-market observations: Homeownership: Table F5-4!C26; Rental: Table F5-4!D26; Condo: Table F5-4!E26; Co-op: Table F5-4!F26; Not Available: Table F5-4!G26; Total: Table F5-4!H26.

Toronto intended-market observations: Homeownership: Table F5-4!C42; Rental: Table F5-4!D42; Condo: Table F5-4!E42; Co-op: Table F5-4!F42; Not Available: Table F5-4!G42; Total: Table F5-4!H42.

Calgary intended-market observations: Homeownership: Table F5-4!C10; Rental: Table F5-4!D10; Condo: Table F5-4!E10; Co-op: Table F5-4!F10; Not Available: Table F5-4!G10; Total: Table F5-4!H10.

Edmonton intended-market observations: Homeownership: Table F5-4!C13; Rental: Table F5-4!D13; Condo: Table F5-4!E13; Co-op: Table F5-4!F13; Not Available: Table F5-4!G13; Total: Table F5-4!H13.

Vancouver intended-market observations: Homeownership: Table F5-4!C44; Rental: Table F5-4!D44; Condo: Table F5-4!E44; Co-op: Table F5-4!F44; Not Available: Table F5-4!G44; Total: Table F5-4!H44.

Tabular observations — Source: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), Starts, Completions and Under Construction; Starts and Completions by Intended Market, June 2026, July 2026. This information is reproduced and distributed on an “as is” basis with the permission of CMHC.

Charts and comparisons — Adapted from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Starts and Completions Survey tables, June 2026, July 2026. This does not constitute an endorsement by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation of this product.

A guide to the numbers · Worked example: July 2026

What housing delivery measures

A permit gives permission. A start marks construction beginning. A completion marks construction finishing. Each answers a different question.

Starts and completions count different events

More homes finished than started in CMHC’s metropolitan-area tables in July 2026. The two counts cover the same month and geography, but they need not follow the same homes.

Construction began

16,374

Dwelling units started during July 2026.

Construction finished

18,797

Dwelling units completed during July 2026. These homes may have started in earlier months or years.

362,059 dwelling units were still under construction at month end.

CMHC metropolitan-area tables · Unadjusted dwelling counts. Starts and completions count activity during the month; under construction counts unfinished units at its end. Box sizes do not represent quantities.

Seasonal patterns have not been removed from these counts. One month does not establish a trend in construction activity.

Read this as three observations. Dividing these completions by these starts does not give a completion rate. That would require following the same set of homes from start to finish.

Why can’t we add the stages together?

A home can be counted as a start and remain under construction in the same month. Adding those figures would count it twice. Permits are different again: they authorize work, but the work may begin later or may never begin.

Our current record’s permits cover Canada; its CMHC construction figures cover metropolitan areas. Check the date and geography printed beside each figure before comparing them.

Does “completed” mean someone has moved in?

No. CMHC measures a construction milestone, not occupancy. Under some circumstances, it can count a building as completed with up to 10% of the proposed work remaining. The intended market, such as rental or condominium, also does not tell us who moved in or what they can afford.

Does this show whether the shortage is closing?

These are gross completions. A national net-additions figure also needs a matching account of homes lost and changes from conversions. Our metropolitan counts do not supply that national balance.

CMHC and the Parliamentary Budget Officer publish different national modelled paths. Each has its own assumptions and target. A monthly metropolitan gross count cannot establish progress against either national net-additions path.

Try it: read a housing headline

Allow five minutes. A headline says, “More homes were completed than started in July, so builders cleared the backlog.” Use the three observations above to explain which part is directly supported and which part needs more evidence.

Then name two things you would check before comparing completions with a national housing target.

Compare your answer

Completions exceeded starts in this metropolitan record. To assess the change in unfinished homes, compare matched month-end stock observations. CMHC also adjusts that stock when work stops or the number of units in a project changes; the starts and completions alone do not supply the full account. These counts also do not measure construction speed or which homes finished.

For the target comparison, check geography, time period, seasonal adjustment and gross versus net additions. National coverage and a matching account of losses and conversions are missing here.

Return to the current housing reading ↑ · Link to this explainer

Sources and responsibility

Worked example: July 2026. CMHC construction tables and definitions, published 2026-08-25. Starts: Table A4_1!F50; completions: Table A4_1!K50; under construction: Table A5_1!F50. The workbook’s explanatory notes define the measures. Read the retained source editions and national benchmark context.

Adapted from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Starts, Completions and Under Construction, July 2026. This does not constitute an endorsement by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation of this product.

Countability is responsible for this explanation and its use of the source. The figures come from CMHC; the teaching exercise is Countability’s. Figures are reproduced from Countability’s retained CMHC record. This is not a claim of review or endorsement by CMHC or an external housing specialist. About Countability and contact.

What the record shows

OBSERVED

People added per housing start: all-time low (-0.7 in 2026 Q2)

The latest value of people added per housing start (-0.7, 2026 Q2) is the lowest in the series history since 2007 (76 quarters of data). A record marks where the series sits in its own history; it carries no causal claim.

Technical details
Method: Latest value compared against the full series history; ties count as records.
INFERRED

Population growth per housing start: -0.7 (was 2.5 a year earlier)

In the four quarters to 2026 Q2, Canada's population declined by 187,499 while housing starts averaged 262,070 units (annualized), so the ratio is negative (-0.7; it was 2.5 a year earlier). New demand pressure from population growth has reversed while supply continues to be added. This says nothing about pre-existing shortage levels, and the inference ignores household-formation shifts, completions lags, and within-country migration.

Technical details
Method: Ratio = (pop[t] − pop[t−4q]) ÷ mean(housing starts SAAR, trailing 12 months). Interpretation benchmarked against ~2.5 persons/household (StatsCan census average).
INFERRED

CMHC's 2025-06 housing benchmark uses a different measure from starts

Canada started 255,061 homes in the 4 quarters to 2026 Q2 (actual, all areas). CMHC's 2025-06 modelled benchmark — restore housing affordability to 2019 (pre-pandemic) levels by 2035, on a rolling 10-year horizon — implies ~478,000 net completions per year over 2025-2035. The comparison crosses unit bases: the benchmark is completions-denominated, but official all-areas WDS completions end in 2022 (latest annual figure: 219,942 in 2022). Direct CMHC metropolitan completion counts are now held, but they are gross monthly units on narrower geography, not this national net-additions basis. Current starts are shown as context, not compliance. The benchmark is a model with stated assumptions, not an observation; the rival benchmark differs by 3.8× on definitions alone (see the housing baseline conflict).

Technical details
Method: Trailing 4-quarter sum of actual housing starts ÷ CMHC benchmark annual rate × 100. Benchmark from cmhc-supply-gap-2025 (2025-06), taken as published; unit-basis mismatch stated.
INFERRED

PBO's 2025-08 housing benchmark uses a different measure from starts

Canada started 255,061 homes in the 4 quarters to 2026 Q2 (actual, all areas). PBO's 2025-08 modelled benchmark — return the total vacancy rate to its 2000-2019 historical average (6.4%) by 2035, while absorbing suppressed household formation (714,000 households projected by 2035) — implies ~290,000 net completions per year over 2025-2035. The comparison crosses unit bases: the benchmark is completions-denominated, but official all-areas WDS completions end in 2022 (latest annual figure: 219,942 in 2022). Direct CMHC metropolitan completion counts are now held, but they are gross monthly units on narrower geography, not this national net-additions basis. Current starts are shown as context, not compliance. The benchmark is a model with stated assumptions, not an observation; the rival benchmark differs by 3.8× on definitions alone (see the housing baseline conflict).

Technical details
Method: Trailing 4-quarter sum of actual housing starts ÷ PBO benchmark annual rate × 100. Benchmark from pbo-housing-gap-2025 (2025-08), taken as published; unit-basis mismatch stated.

Institutional projections on file

CMHCvintage 2022-06

Canada's Housing Supply Shortages: Estimating what is needed to solve Canada's housing affordability crisis by 2030 (with 2023 update)

Restore housing affordability to early-2000s levels by 2030 annual rate This vintage was expressed as a cumulative additional-units figure, not an annual rate.; cumulative 3,500,000.

Source: CMHC publication · accessed 2026-07-08
CMHCvintage 2025-06

Canada's Housing Supply Shortages: Moving to a New Framework

Restore housing affordability to 2019 (pre-pandemic) levels by 2035, on a rolling 10-year horizon annual rate 478,000; cumulative 2,600,000.

Source: CMHC publication · accessed 2026-07-07
PBOvintage 2025-08

Household Formation and the Housing Stock: Estimating the Housing Gap in 2035 (RP-2526-007-S)

Return the total vacancy rate to its 2000-2019 historical average (6.4%) by 2035, while absorbing suppressed household formation (714,000 households projected by 2035) annual rate 290,000; cumulative 690,000.

Source: PBO publication · accessed 2026-07-08

Where institutions disagree

Institutions disagreemagnitude 3.8x

How many additional homes does Canada need by 2035?

CMHC: 2,600,000 additional units by 2035

Units needed to restore housing affordability to 2019 (pre-pandemic) levels by 2035; implies ~478,000 net completions per year (range 430,000-480,000) → source

PBO: 690,000 additional units by 2035

Units needed to return the total vacancy rate to its 2000-2019 average (6.4%) by 2035 and absorb suppressed household formation; implies ~290,000 completions per year → source

Why they differ: Different target definitions, not different data: CMHC models the supply needed to restore a chosen affordability level; PBO models the supply needed to normalize vacancy rates and absorb suppressed households. PBO's report states that CMHC's target would imply a ~13% total vacancy rate, which PBO characterizes as abnormally high.

Countability’s position: None. Actual construction is tracked against both paths, each in its own units, with each issuer's definition displayed.

What cannot yet be known

Evidence gap

How many homes is Canada actually completing right now?

What is missing: Narrowed September 8, 2026: a documented CMHC Excel route now supplies reproducible June and July 2026 metropolitan starts, under-construction stocks and gross completions, with July intended-market detail. The three held Statistics Canada completion mirrors still end in 2022. The broader CMHC provincial totals include smaller-centre values despite conflicting survey-coverage notes, so this reading uses the explicitly labelled metropolitan tables. A current, verified all-areas completion series and national net-additions measure remain outside the comparable evidence held here.

Consequence: The machine-readable-route branch of the original closing criterion is met for metropolitan counts. This is a narrowing, not restoration of all-areas coverage or a national benchmark-compliance measure. Gross monthly completions on metropolitan geography cannot be divided by either institution’s national annual net-additions benchmark. Cancellation and occupancy outcomes remain separate gaps.

What would close it: Restoration of the post-2022 completions series in Statistics Canada's public data tables, or confirmation of a stable, documented, machine-readable CMHC source (e.g., a downloadable dataset or API distinct from the HMIP interactive portal) that Countability could collect automatically.
Evidence gap

How many authorized or started homes are cancelled before completion?

What is missing: No continuously updated machine-readable cancellation count or rate is held on a verified comparable basis for this reading. The qualified CMHC construction tables report starts, stocks and completions; stock adjustments for cessation or unit-count changes do not isolate cancellations. The separately unfetched Market Absorption Survey concerns absorption after completion, not pre-completion cancellation; it is not activated by this source admission.

Consequence: The Housing Delivery module now observes separate construction stages. It still cannot measure a cancellation rate, a linked permit-to-completion conversion rate or occupancy. Missing cancellations are never imputed as zero; broader source discovery remains open under the registered criterion.

What would close it: CMHC, a provincial regulator, or a municipal permitting authority publishing a continuously updated, machine-readable cancellation count or rate for authorized or started residential units.
Evidence gap

How fast are new households forming right now?

What is missing: No official sub-annual household-formation series exists for Canada. The official household count (StatsCan 17-10-0159) is annual (July 1 reference, published each November, based on the 2021 Census adjusted for undercoverage plus the T1 Family File and postcensal estimates).

Consequence: Quarterly or monthly comparisons of housing supply against 'household formation' necessarily use modelled formation (e.g., PBO's projections) or population-based proxies. Countability publishes population-per-completion (observed) quarterly and completions-per-formation (observed) annually, and labels any sub-annual formation figure as modelled.

What would close it: A StatsCan sub-annual household estimate or administrative household series.
Evidence gap

Is Canada building family-sized homes?

What is missing: Bedroom-count detail for new supply exists only in CMHC's Housing Market Information Portal, which has no machine-readable public API. The StatsCan mirror (34-10-0148) provides dwelling type (single/semi/row/apartment) but not bedroom counts.

Consequence: Countability uses dwelling-type composition (ground-oriented vs apartment) as a stated proxy for family-sized supply.

What would close it: CMHC publishing bedroom-level starts/completions as open data.

What has since been established

Evidence gapResolved 8 July 2026

Is PBO's ~290,000-per-year requirement stated net or gross of demolitions and conversions?

What is missing: The PBO publication page states the requirement as 'total units completed annually'; whether this is net of stock losses was unconfirmed pending review of the full report.

Consequence: Prior to resolution, TARGET/benchmark comparisons against the PBO path used gross completions with a caveat displayed.

Resolved 8 July 2026: PBO's publication page explicitly defines 'net housing completions' as completions plus conversions less demolitions, and models housing stock as Housing stock(t) = Housing stock(t-1) + Completions(t) + Conversions(t) - Demolitions(t). The ~290,000/yr figure is on this net basis. This record's own benchmark entry for the PBO housing gap was updated accordingly: its unit basis now reads net completions, and its pending-verification flag was cleared. Caveat retained: PBO's and CMHC's respective 'net completions' concepts are not confirmed to be composed identically (e.g., treatment of conversions) and should not be silently equated.

What would have closed it: Verification against the full PBO report (RP-2526-007-S).

What would change the record

Investigation

Deep Dive · 7 min read

Whose benchmark? The disagreement over how much housing Canada needs

Two institutions size the housing shortfall differently, construction proceeds at a measured pace against both paths, and part of the record has simply stopped updating.

The maintained reading

Monitor

Canadian Capacity Monitor

Is Canada's institutional, physical, fiscal, and labour capacity keeping pace with the demands being placed upon it?

This Big Question organizes the evidence: the commitments, the disagreements, the projections, and the gaps — and it states plainly where the evidence cannot yet reach. When Countability has a current answer, it appears separately on this page with its date, basis, limits, Brief and Receipt. The question stays open; the evidence keeps moving.

Related on this site

This page holds the current public record for this question. For a more specific question, see Work with Countability.

Work with Countability